May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
June 2001
March 2001
May 2000
January 1994
August 1970
So, busy and stuff.
I've been working on the idea of character flaws in a play setting, as a method of limiting the out-of-control power spiral that often happens in certain open-ended games. I think this is an elegant way to build "release valves" into characters that may otherwise just continue on the treadmill to demigod-hood. Instead of just becoming more and more powerful, until it is no longer fun to play them, play with them, or create a world challenging enough for them to play in, characters may have explicitly defined "fatal flaws" that may be discovered and exploited by other players in a competitive setting, or by the players' enemies in a "scripted" setting. These must be interesting enough to be accepted as an essential part of story and character development, so the player won't feel cheated, while still being inevitable enough, one way or another, to eventually knock the character's standing down in some way another, so they no longer present an insurmountable opponent to those playing against them.
The exact implementation of this in the game I'm currently working on is still undetermined, in the process of being mulled over and figured on, but I've been playing with some really stripped-down mechanics to test different theories. One of the results of this fiddling is a card game, Tragedy, which captures some of the feeling of probing and exploiting, but in a much more drastic way, more suited to a quick game than an ongoing play session. I've run a handful of tests, trying different things (giving an attacker half of your cards when they hit the right "flaw" card rank, eliminating the high/low hints, different hand building strategies, etc.), but I think this one is a good first shot at balancing the screwage with relatively fair game play. It's still a little random for my liking - I'd like it to be a bit more stategy-oriented than luck-driven, and it's a lot less fun with just two players - but for now, it'll do.
(January 12, 2004 01:45 AM)FFs: mine will always be my temper.
hey lady, you should email me or tell me whereat/when you're on irc. instead of just flonging my journal.
Posted by: cindy on January 12, 2004 05:57 PM